Skip to main content
Closing reference

BC Real Property Report (RPR)

Last reviewed by Bronson Job PREC, REALTOR®Sources: BC Government, BC Land Title Office, BC Land Surveyors, Insurance Bureau of CanadaCC BY 4.0How we verify

What an RPR is, who pays, when it should be delivered, the common encroachment issues (fence, eaves, unpermitted additions), and the single contract clause that flips the timing leverage from seller to buyer. Sourced from /codex#bc.pds.

The defendable opinion

Most BC detached buyers don’t see their RPR until 48 hours before completion. By then, if the report shows an unpermitted addition or a fence three feet over the property line, you’re forced into a panic decision. The fix is to require RPR delivery before subject removal — but that’s not the BC default and your agent has to ask.

Subject to delivery of an acceptable Real Property Report at least 5 business days before subject-removal date. One sentence; flips all the leverage.
— What I write into every detached offer above $1.5M

RPR vs. title insurance, in 1 sentence each

RPR = a current surveyor diagram showing where the property’s legal boundaries actually are and where every permanent improvement sits relative to those boundaries. Up-front disclosure tool. Cost: $750–$1,500.

Title insurance = an indemnity policy that compensates you (post-closing) for losses arising from undisclosed title defects, including some types of boundary + encroachment issues. After-the-fact indemnity tool. Cost: $250–$500.

They solve different problems. Title insurance is the cheaper post-closing safety net. The RPR is the up-front leverage that lets you negotiate price, demand a fix, or walk away cleanly. On any meaningful Lower Mainland detached, prefer the RPR.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Fort Langley detached at $1.95M with unpermitted basement suite

Bought 2026 at $1.95M. RPR delivered 4 business days before subject-removal date (per the contract clause). RPR shows: a finished basement suite with separate entrance + secondary kitchen built circa 2018. Municipal permit history shows: foundation work permitted 2018, but no secondary suite permit. The buyer’s lawyer flagged: this is unauthorized accommodation under the Township of Langley bylaw. Seller PDS had answered “No” to the unauthorized-accommodations question. Buyer demanded $40K price reduction OR retroactive permit application before completion. Seller agreed to the price reduction. Net: $40K saved + clean conscience on the disclosure question. Without the pre-subject-removal RPR clause, buyer would have learned 48 hours before completion and been negotiating from no leverage.

Example 2 — Walnut Grove detached with fence 2.5 feet onto neighbour’s lot

Detached at $1.6M. RPR shows the rear fence is 2.5 feet onto the neighbour’s lot — longstanding (the fence has been there since 1998 per the seller). Lawyer’s analysis: at this duration, BC’s “adverse possession” doctrine is functionally not available against private land (the doctrine was abolished in BC in 1975 for new claims), but the encroachment is also not a financing concern at this scale. The fix: a written easement filed on title, agreed to by both neighbours. Cost: ~$300 of legal time. Buyer proceeded; deal completed cleanly.

Example 3 — Point Grey detached at $4.2M with eaves over rear lane

Heritage character home built 1924. RPR shows the rear-roof eaves project 14 inches over the laneway right-of-way. Encroachment is over a municipal right-of-way (City of Vancouver lane), not a private neighbour. Lawyer recommended a Statutory Right-of-Way grant from the City to formalize the eave projection. City agreed (typical fee: $1,200). Lender accepted the SROW filing as sufficient title curative. Buyer proceeded. Without the RPR, the buyer would have learned during a future renovation when permit-pulling required dimension checks — potentially decades later, but $1,200 of friction now is better than uncertainty.

Example 4 — South Surrey detached with unpermitted garage extension

Detached at $2.8M. RPR shows a garage extension built ~2015. Municipal permit history shows the original garage permit but no extension permit. Surrey Building bylaw requires retroactive permit + structural engineer’s sign-off. Seller refused the work; buyer walked. Lesson: not every encroachment is fixable, and not every seller will play ball. The pre-subject-removal RPR clause is the buyer’s clean exit. The same buyer purchased a similarly-priced detached two months later in Cloverdale with a clean RPR; the failed deal cost ~$300 of legal review and zero deposit.

The three encroachments to expect

  1. Fence misplacement — most common. Fence is 1–3 feet onto the neighbour’s lot or vice versa. Usually fixed with a written easement; rarely material.
  2. Eaves over the property line or right-of-way — common on character homes. Roof eaves project 6–18 inches past the legal line. Lender may require a permanent easement or Statutory Right-of-Way filed on title.
  3. Unpermitted addition — the costly one. Deck, sunroom, basement suite, or garage extension built without a building permit. Municipal remediation can run from a $500 retroactive permit fee to a five-figure structural redesign + engineering. Always cross-reference with municipal permit history.

Frequently asked questions

  • What is a Real Property Report (RPR)?

    A surveyor-prepared diagram showing the property's legal boundaries and the location of all permanent improvements (the house, garage, fence, deck, shed, etc.) relative to those boundaries. In BC the document is most commonly called a "Building Location Survey" or "Survey Certificate"; the term "Real Property Report" is more common in Alberta but is widely used colloquially in BC. The RPR also discloses easements, rights-of-way, and any visible encroachments. Lenders typically require a current RPR (less than 5 years old, often less than 2 years) on detached properties before releasing mortgage funds.

  • Who pays for the RPR — buyer or seller?

    In BC, the seller traditionally provides the RPR if one is required by the buyer's lender or if the buyer requests it as a subject. If the seller does not have a current RPR and refuses to provide one, the buyer may need to commission their own (typical cost: $750–$1,500 for a Lower Mainland lot, depending on lot size and complexity). Best practice: include "subject to receipt + review of an acceptable RPR (or title insurance accepted by the lender in lieu)" in the offer. The lender determines whether title insurance can substitute; some accept it on resale detached homes, others require the actual RPR.

  • What's the difference between an RPR and title insurance?

    An RPR is a current surveyor diagram of physical reality. Title insurance is an indemnity contract that compensates the insured for losses arising from undisclosed title defects (including some types of encroachments + boundary issues). Many BC lenders will accept a title insurance policy in lieu of a current RPR, which is faster + cheaper. BUT title insurance covers post-closing surprises only; it does not show you the encroachment in advance, which means you cannot negotiate price, demand a repair, or walk away. The RPR is the up-front-disclosure tool; title insurance is the after-the-fact-indemnity tool. They solve different problems.

  • What encroachment issues commonly appear on BC RPRs?

    Three patterns dominate Lower Mainland detached. (1) Fence misplacement: most common. Either the seller's fence is 1–3 feet onto the neighbour's lot, or vice versa. The fix is usually a written easement or fence relocation; rarely material if the encroachment is small + longstanding. (2) Eaves over the property line: the house's roof eave projects 6–18 inches past the legal property line into a neighbour's yard or a municipal right-of-way. Often a longstanding non-issue but lenders may require a permanent easement filed on title. (3) Unpermitted addition: a deck, sunroom, garage extension, or basement-suite work that was built without a building permit. The municipality can require remediation (removal or retroactive permit) — sometimes a five-figure fix. Always cross-reference with municipal building permit history before subject removal.

  • My lender said title insurance is acceptable instead of an RPR — should I still want the RPR?

    Often yes. Title insurance covers your downside post-closing but the underwriter's premium is calibrated to the insurer's risk, not yours. If the property has a 2-foot eave encroachment that title insurance covers, you still inherit the property with the encroachment — and the next buyer may demand a price discount when they negotiate against the same disclosure. The RPR gives you the negotiating leverage in advance. On a $2.5M+ Lower Mainland detached, the $1,000 RPR cost is a rounding error against the negotiating leverage it preserves.

  • When in the closing timeline should the RPR be delivered?

    Best practice: BEFORE subject removal. Default practice in BC: 48 hours before completion, after the buyer's lawyer requests it during the pre-completion title search. The default leaves the buyer in the worst possible position — funds committed, mortgage approved, deposit at risk, moving truck booked, and now the RPR shows an unpermitted addition. The fix is to negotiate "delivery of acceptable RPR before subject-removal date" into the offer. Most BC sellers will agree if asked; few buyers ask. This is the single most actionable item in this guide.

  • What if the RPR shows an unpermitted addition that the seller didn't disclose?

    You have several options depending on contract status. (1) Pre-subject-removal: most powerful. You can demand the seller obtain a retroactive permit, demand a price reduction, or walk away cleanly. (2) Post-subject-removal but pre-completion: more difficult. You may have a misrepresentation claim under the Property Disclosure Statement if the seller answered "No" to a relevant question; consult your lawyer immediately. (3) Post-completion: hardest. Title insurance may cover some scenarios; PDS misrepresentation litigation is available but slow + expensive. The Property Disclosure Statement is a legal document — if the seller knowingly answered "No" to "Are there any unauthorized accommodations?" when there is one, that is actionable misrepresentation.

  • Do I need an RPR on a strata property?

    Generally no. The strata corporation owns the common property + boundaries; individual unit owners own air-space rights inside their unit boundaries (or in some cases, a defined parcel for townhouses). Lenders typically do NOT require an RPR for strata units. The strata's Form B + Strata Plan provide the boundary information. Townhouse stratas with bareland-strata structures occasionally require RPR-equivalent surveys, but this is rare. Confirm with your lawyer if you're buying a bareland-strata or duplex-conversion property.

Verified sources (1)Click to expand

Every claim on this page is sourced to a primary government, regulator, or industry-association URL. We re-verify quarterly; the verification dates below show when each source was last confirmed against the live government page.

Fact ID: bc.pds · v1View in Codex →
Verified sources (2)Click to expand

Every claim on this page is sourced to a primary government, regulator, or industry-association URL. We re-verify quarterly; the verification dates below show when each source was last confirmed against the live government page.

Fact ID: bc.builders_lien_act.overview · v1View in Codex →
Bronson Job PREC, REALTOR®
Bronson Job PRECREALTOR® · GVR Member #6015742 · FVREB Member #FJOBBR